Labor in colonial America was scarce. Explain the development of using slaves for labor
MUST BE ORIGINAL NOT PLAGIARISM…ALSO PLEASE SEE ATTACHED RUBRIC.I NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE!!
Labor in colonial America was scarce. Explain the development of using slaves for labor in the colonies. Below are some of the items you may include:
•The development of using slaves for labor
•Changes, problems, and issues with slave labor
•Unintended consequences of using slave labor
![](http://researchvine.blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/homework-deadline.jpeg)
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Labor in colonial America was scarce. Explain the development of using slaves for labor completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Complete a 2-3 page paper must follow APA Requirements. Each paper should include at least four paragraphs: an introduction, a body with at least two fully developed paragraphs, and a conclusion. Also, references on separate page.
Please see attached rubric and follow it in order to get a good grade thank you.
HST201
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2
Meets Expectation |
Approaches |
Below Expectation |
Limited Evidence |
|
Expectation |
||||
Content, Research, and Analysis |
||||
17-20 |
13-16 Points |
9-12 Points |
5-8 Points |
|
Requirements |
Includes all of the |
Includes most of |
Includes some of |
Includes few of the |
required |
the required |
the required |
required |
|
components, as |
components, as |
components, as |
components, as |
|
specified in the |
specified in the |
specified in the |
specified in the |
|
assignment. |
assignment. |
assignment. |
assignment. |
|
17-20 Points |
13-16 Points |
9-12 Points |
5-8 Points |
|
Content |
Demonstrates |
Some significant |
Major errors or |
Fails to |
strong or adequate |
but not major |
omissions in |
demonstrate |
|
knowledge of |
errors or omissions |
demonstration of |
knowledge of labor |
|
labor scarcity in |
in demonstration |
knowledge of labor |
scarcity in colonial |
|
colonial America; |
of knowledge of |
scarcity in colonial |
America. |
|
correctly |
labor scarcity in |
America. |
||
represents |
colonial America. |
|||
knowledge from |
||||
the readings and |
||||
sources. |
||||
17-20 Points |
13-16 Points |
9-12 Points |
5-8 Points |
|
Critical Analysis |
Provides a strong |
Some significant |
Major errors or |
Fails to provide |
critical analysis |
but not major |
omissions in |
critical analysis and |
|
and interpretation |
errors or omissions |
analysis and |
interpretation of |
|
of using slaves or |
in analysis and |
interpretation of |
using slaves or |
|
indentured |
interpretation of |
using slaves or |
indentured |
|
servants for labor |
using slaves or |
indentured |
servants for labor |
|
in colonial |
indentured |
servants for labor |
in colonial America. |
|
America. |
servants for labor |
in colonial America. |
||
in colonial America. |
||||
9-10 Points |
7-8 Points |
5-6 Points |
3-4 Points |
|
Sources / |
Sources or |
Sources or |
Sources or |
Source or example |
Examples |
examples meet |
examples meet |
examples meet |
selection and |
required criteria |
required criteria |
required criteria |
integration of |
|
and are well |
but are less‐than |
and are poorly |
knowledge from |
|
chosen to provide |
adequately chosen |
chosen to provide |
the course is |
|
substance and |
to provide |
substance and |
clearly deficient. |
|
perspectives on |
substance and |
perspectives on the |
||
the scarcity of |
perspectives on the |
scarcity of labor. |
||
labor. |
scarcity of labor. |
|||
Mechanics and Writing |
||||
9-10 Points |
7-8 Points |
5-6 Points |
3-4 Points |
|
Demonstrates |
Project is clearly |
Project is fairly well |
Project is poorly |
Project is not |
college-level |
organized, well |
organized and |
organized; does |
organized or well |
proficiency in |
written, and in |
written, and is in |
not follow proper |
written, and is not |
organization, |
proper format as |
proper format as |
paper format. |
in proper paper |
grammar and |
outlined in the |
outlined in the |
Inconsistent to |
format. Poor |
HST201
Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2
style. |
assignment. Strong |
assignment. |
inadequate |
quality work; |
sentence and |
Reasonably good |
sentence and |
unacceptable in |
|
paragraph |
sentence and |
paragraph |
terms of grammar |
|
structure; few |
paragraph |
development; |
and spelling. |
|
errors in grammar |
structure; |
numerous errors in |
||
and spelling. |
significant number |
grammar and |
||
of errors in |
spelling. |
|||
grammar and |
||||
spelling. |
||||
9-10 Points |
7-8 Points |
5-6 Points |
3-4 Points |
|
Demonstrates |
Project contains |
Few errors in APA |
Significant errors in |
Numerous errors in |
proper use of |
proper APA |
formatting, |
APA formatting, |
APA formatting, |
APA style |
formatting, |
according to the |
according to the |
according to the |
according to the |
CSU-Global Guide |
CSU-Global Guide |
CSU-Global Guide |
|
CSU-Global Guide |
to Writing and APA |
to Writing and APA |
to Writing and APA |
|
to Writing and APA |
Requirements,with |
Requirements,with |
Requirements,with |
|
Requirements, |
no more than two |
four to five |
more than five |
|
with no more than |
to three significant |
significant errors. |
significant errors. |
|
one significant |
errors. |
|||
error. |
Total points possible = 90