Nursing Assignment about Evidence-Based Research

Citation: Košanski, T.; Neuberg, M.

Proficiency and Practices of Nursing

Professionals in Meeting Patients’

Spiritual Needs within Palliative Care

Services: A Nationwide,

Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare 2024,

12, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/

healthcare12070725

Academic Editor: Silvio Cavuto

Received: 12 February 2024

Revised: 20 March 2024

Accepted: 25 March 2024

Published: 26 March 2024

Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

This article is an open access article

distributed under the terms and

conditions of the Creative Commons

Attribution (CC BY) license (https://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by/

4.0/).

healthcare

Article

Proficiency and Practices of Nursing Professionals in Meeting Patients’ Spiritual Needs within Palliative Care Services: A Nationwide, Cross-Sectional Study Tina Košanski 1,2,* and Marijana Neuberg 1,2

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Novo mesto, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Department of Nursing, University North, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia * Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract: Spirituality and spiritual needs are integral parts of the human experience, but they are often particularly important for palliative care patients. Spirituality has numerous positive effects, especially for those dealing with serious illness. Nevertheless, the spiritual dimension is sometimes overlooked in patient care. This study aims to determine the frequency of addressing the spiritual needs of palliative care patients in Croatia and to investigate the self-perceived confidence of caregivers in this task. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted involving 194 nurses in specialised palliative care services across Croatia. A specially developed and validated questionnaire was used for this study. The most common intervention undertaken by respondents was “promoting hope and optimism in patients” (88.4%), while the least common intervention was “reading books and other publications to patients” (13.9%). No statistically significant differences were found in the frequency of spiritual care in relation to the respondent’s level of education, professional experience and nursing environment. Approximately two-thirds of the surveyed nurses stated that they “often” or “always” provided some kind of spiritual care to palliative care patients. However, study participants who indicated that they had received sufficient formal instruction in addressing spiritual needs and spiritual care interventions demonstrated a statistically significant tendency to engage in these practices, as well as greater confidence in their knowledge and skills in this area compared to those who lacked such training. The study suggests that there is a need to identify existing barriers to the provision of spiritual care and to develop strategies to overcome them. By placing emphasis on the spiritual needs and preferences of patients, nursing professionals and other healthcare providers have the opportunity to elevate the standard of holistic care and foster a sense of comfort and dignity among patients.

Keywords: spirituality; spiritual needs; palliative care; nurses

1. Introduction

Due to the ageing of the population and the associated increase in chronic, i.e., non- communicable diseases, the need for palliative care continues to grow, drawing attention to the importance of this area of biomedicine and healthcare. Studies indicate that 69–82% of people in high-income countries require palliative care [1]. Currently, the annual number of people needing palliative care is estimated at 56.8 million [2], with projections suggesting a 25.0% to 42.4% relative increase by 2040 (primarily driven by the ageing population) [3]. These statistics emphasise the importance of investing in the further development of pallia- tive care, improving its quality and determining its current status in individual countries.

Palliative care is established in Croatia and is implemented on three levels:

• At the first level, referred to as the “palliative approach”, palliative methods and procedures are integrated into settings that are not primarily focused on palliative care. Healthcare professionals at this level have basic knowledge of palliative care.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070725 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/healthcare

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 2 of 14

• The second level includes “general palliative care”, which is provided by healthcare professionals who frequently deal with patients requiring palliative care, even if this is not their primary area of responsibility, such as in oncology and neurology departments.

The third level comprises “specialised palliative care”, which deals with the complex needs of palliative care patients and entails advanced training, dedicated staff, and other resources. Specialised palliative care requires a collaborative interdisciplinary approach and a multiprofessional team [4,5]. In addition, all members of the specialised palliative care teams should have additional training in palliative care [6].

The forms of specialised palliative care in Croatia include various services, such as palliative care coordination centres, mobile palliative care teams, palliative care facilities (hospices), palliative care units, palliative care beds, palliative day hospitals, palliative care clinics, palliative care hospital teams, equipment rentals, volunteers, and civil society organisations [6].

All three levels of palliative care are available in the Croatian healthcare system, namely in primary healthcare (e.g., mobile palliative care teams, GP practices, community nursing services, home care, social welfare centres, and inpatient clinics in health centres), secondary healthcare (e.g., general and county hospital), and tertiary healthcare (e.g., clinics, clinical hospitals, and clinical hospital centres) [7].

An important concern identified both in the literature and in practice is that the care provided to palliative care patients is incomplete as it ignores their diverse and numerous needs and often does not take into account all dimensions of the individual [8–10]. More specifically, despite palliative care’s focus on providing holistic support—including physical, emotional, and social aspects—the spiritual dimension is frequently overlooked.

Spiritual needs in palliative care can be defined as an individual’s sense of peace, purpose, connection to others, and beliefs about the meaning of life [11,12]. The challenges related to spiritual well-being, saying goodbye to loved ones, maintaining hope and other end-of-life concerns are often poorly understood and not sufficiently integrated into patients’ overall care plans [11]. As a result, spiritual care and support (which is not necessarily synonymous with religion) are often labelled as the most overlooked dimension of patient care [12].

This study aims to determine the frequency of interventions performed by nurses in Croatia (such as active listening, engaging in discussions, compassionate presence, promoting spiritual reflection and reading, to name a few) in order to address the spiritual needs of palliative care patients and their self-perceived confidence in this task.

2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Research Design and Methodology of Data Collection

To collect the research data, a quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted in Croatia from January to June 2023. The research was carried out as part of work towards a doctoral thesis to obtain relevant knowledge about the implementation of the holistic approach in palliative care, and the presented results are an integral part of the dissertation.

2.2. Measuring Instrument

A questionnaire was created for this study based on the relevant academic and profes- sional literature [13–18].

The questionnaire consisted of several parts: In the first part, socio-demographic data were collected (gender, age, years of profes-

sional experience in healthcare, years of professional experience in palliative care, level of education, and work setting).

The second part of the questionnaire collected data on the frequency of addressing patients’ spiritual needs, specifically the frequency of undertaking selected interventions. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency of performing each intervention on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1—never; 2—rarely; 3—sometimes; 4—often; 5—always.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 3 of 14

In the third part of the questionnaire, respondents were asked to self-assess their confidence in the stated interventions on a 5-point Likert scale: 1—poor; 2—fair; 3—good; 4—very good; 5—excellent.

The fourth section of the questionnaire dealt with the importance of holistic care in the formal education of nurses. Participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the statements about the importance given to the spiritual dimension in nursing care during their education, i.e., whether they felt that patients’ spiritual needs were adequately addressed. Responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale: 1—I strongly disagree; 2—I disagree; 3—I neither agree nor disagree; 4—I agree; 5—I strongly agree.

2.3. Sample

The sample is a random sample. As accurate records of nurses in specialised palliative care services were not available, the authors contacted all services with palliative care beds at the secondary and tertiary healthcare levels and healthcare centres in all counties in Croatia to determine the number of nurses in roles such as palliative care coordinators and members of mobile palliative care team, as well as those working in inpatient clinics with palliative care beds in health centres at the primary healthcare level. According to the available information, 313 nurses with different levels of education were working in specialised palliative care services throughout Croatia during the study period (personal communication, unpublished).

Our total sample included 194 nurses with different levels of education working in specialised palliative care services in Croatia (palliative care coordinators, members of mobile palliative care teams, nurses in inpatient clinics at health centres, nurses in palliative care facilities, and nurses in palliative care units). In Croatia, only nurses in specialised palliative care services exclusively care for patients needing palliative care, while nurses at other levels also care for other patients.

The criteria for inclusion in the study were as follows:

• Participants were general care nurses holding a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate degree in nursing.

• At the time of the survey, participants were working in specialised palliative care services in roles such as palliative care coordinators, members of mobile palliative care teams, nursing staff in inpatient clinics in health centres with palliative care beds, nurs- ing staff in palliative care units, or nursing staff in palliative care facilities (hospices).

• Only palliative care coordinators who were also working in mobile palliative care teams (as stand-ins or because the team was understaffed) at the time of the survey were eligible for participation.

A total of 286 questionnaires were distributed in the workplace of nursing profession- als, of which 194 correctly completed questionnaires (67.8%) and 1 incorrectly completed questionnaire were returned.

2.4. Ethical Considerations

General ethical approval for the research was obtained from the University of Novo mesto (FZV-282/2021). The ethics committees of all primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare institutions in Croatia that provide specialised palliative care were sent research application forms. Of the total of 40 institutions that provide specialised palliative care (28 institutions at the primary, 11 institutions at the secondary, and 1 institution at the tertiary level of healthcare), consent was obtained from 33 institutions (23 institutions at the primary level of healthcare, 9 institutions at the secondary level of healthcare, and 1 institution at the tertiary level of healthcare). Before completing the survey, participants were informed about the purpose of the study, the use of the data, the assurance of anonymity, risk-free participation, and the possibility of voluntary withdrawal, which they confirmed by signing the consent form.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 4 of 14

2.5. Statistical Analysis of the Data

The data obtained from the questionnaire were presented descriptively and in tab- ular form. The descriptions and tables were created using Microsoft Office Word, while IBM SPSS Statistics Version 29.0.1 was used for the statistical analysis. Numerical data were tested for normal distribution using the Smirnov–Kolmogorov test, and appropriate parametric statistical tests were applied depending on the results.

Quantitative data were presented as means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals, while categorical data were presented as absolute frequencies and proportions or 95% confidence intervals.

The correlation between the work setting and the frequency of interventions by nurses/technicians in specialised palliative care services was analysed using the one-way ANOVA. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to analyse the relationship between frequency of interventions, confidence level, years of experience, level of education, and inclusion of holistic care in nursing education among nurses/technicians in specialised palliative care services.

A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (two-tailed).

3. Results 3.1. Socio-Demographic Categorical and Quantitative Variables

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic categorical variables for the entire sample (N = 194). The majority of the sample analysed are women (177, or 91.20%). Most of the respondents, 96 of them (49.5%), have completed training for general care nurses. Regarding the organisation of working hours, 12 h tours were the most common (94 or 48.5% of respondents), followed by early shift work (85 or 29.90% of respondents). For almost half of the respondents (92 or 47.40%), the functional model of healthcare organisation was the predominant model. In terms of the work setting, most respondents (109 or 56.20%) worked in a palliative care facility/unit, while 38 respondents (19.60%) were members of mobile palliative care teams. In terms of patient categorisation, 138 (71.10%) of the respondents most commonly cared for patients who fell into category IV.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic categorical variables for the entire sample (N = 194).

N % 95% CI

Gender Male 17 8.80% 5.40% 13.40%

Female 177 91.20% 86.60% 94.60%

Level of education

General care nurse/technician 96 49.50% 42.50% 56.50% Undergraduate professional/university study in nursing 62 32.00% 25.70% 38.80%

Graduate professional/university study in nursing 33 17.00% 12.20% 22.80% Doctoral study programme 3 1.50% 0.40% 4.10%

Organisation of working hours

Early shift 58 29.90% 23.80% 36.60% Early and afternoon shifts 17 8.80% 5.40% 13.40%

Early, afternoon and night shifts 24 12.40% 8.30% 17.60% 12 h tours 94 48.50% 41.50% 55.50%

Shift work with on-call duty 1 0.50% 0.10% 2.40%

Organisational model Functional 92 47.40% 40.50% 54.40%

Team 61 31.40% 25.20% 38.20% Primary 41 21.10% 15.80% 27.30%

Work setting

Member of a mobile palliative care team 38 19.60% 14.50% 25.60% Palliative care coordinator 15 7.70% 4.60% 12.10%

Nurse/technician in an inpatient clinic at the health centre 23 11.90% 7.90% 17.00% Nurse/technician in a palliative care facility/unit 109 56.20% 49.20% 63.00%

Nurse/technician in a hospice 9 4.60% 2.30% 8.30%

Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic quantitative variables for the entire sample. The mean age (SD) of the respondents is 38.55 (12.08) years. The average professional experience in healthcare is 16.84 (11.79) years, while the average professional experience in palliative care is 5.24 (4.71) years.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 5 of 14

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic quantitative variables for the entire sample (N = 194).

Arithmetic Mean

SD Min Max Centile

25 Median 75

Age 38.55 12.08 20.00 65.00 29.00 37.50 47.25 Years of experience in healthcare 16.84 11.79 1.00 45.00 7.00 15.00 25.00

Years of experience in palliative care 5.24 4.71 0.20 39.00 2.00 4.00 7.00

3.2. Internal Consistency Analysis for the Subscale “Frequency of Addressing Patients’ Spiritual Needs” and the Subscale “Confidence in Addressing Patients’ Spiritual Needs”

Table 3 shows the analysis of the internal consistency of spiritual care interventions. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the indicated subscale is 0.777.

Table 3. Analysis of the internal consistency of spiritual care interventions.

Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient Number of Items

0.777 7

Arithmetic mean SD I promote hope and optimism in patients. 4.49 0.707

I pray with patients if needed. 2.86 1.315 I make sure that patients have the opportunity to attend religious services. 3.56 1.213 I read books, newspapers, and other publications to patients when needed. 2.44 1.128

I involve a member of clergy in patient care. 3.48 1.26 I engage in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their past

accomplishments. 3.85 0.964

I talk to patients about their imminent death if they feel the need to do so. 3.67 1.055

Corrected item correlation-total

score

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient if item

deleted I promote hope and optimism in patients. 0.384 0.772

I pray with patients if needed. 0.559 0.738 I make sure that patients have the opportunity to attend religious services. 0.57 0.735 I read books, newspapers, and other publications to patients when needed. 0.556 0.738

I involve a member of clergy in patient care. 0.595 0.729 I engage in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their past

accomplishments. 0.404 0.767

I talk to patients about their imminent death if they feel the need to do so. 0.444 0.76

Table 4 shows an analysis of the internal consistency of the statements on the partici- pants’ confidence in the spiritual care interventions listed. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the indicated subscale is 0.832. The indicated subscale demonstrates a high level of internal consistency, suggesting that the items within this subscale reliably measure participants’ confidence.

Table 4. Analysis of the internal consistency of the statements on confidence in spiritual care interventions.

Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient Number of Items

0.832 7

Arithmetic mean SD Promoting hope and optimism in patients. 4.18 0.823

Praying with patients. 3.32 1.148 Making sure that patients have the opportunity to attend religious services. 3.46 1.097

Reading books, newspapers, and other publications to patients. 3.26 1.095 Involving a member of clergy in patient care. 3.68 1.116

Engaging in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their past accomplishments. 3.94 0.894 Talking to patients about their impending death. 3.72 1

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 6 of 14

Table 4. Cont.

Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient Number of Items

Corrected item correlation—

total score

Cronbach’s alfa coefficient if item deleted

Promoting hope and optimism in patients. 0.487 0.823 Praying with patients. 0.657 0.796

Making sure that patients have the opportunity to attend religious services. 0.699 0.789 Reading books, newspapers and other publications to patients. 0.562 0.813

Involving a member of clergy in patient care. 0.569 0.811 Engaging in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their past accomplishments. 0.577 0.811

Talking to patients about their impending death. 0.518 0.819

3.3. Descriptive Data on the Frequency of Spiritual Care Interventions

Table 5 shows the respondents’ answers regarding the frequency with which the stated interventions were carried out. In total, 60.80% of respondents reported “always” promoting hope and optimism in patients. Only 15.50% said they “always” prayed with patients, and only 30.90% “always” ensured that patients had the opportunity to attend religious services. Reading books or other publications to patients is the least frequently performed intervention—22.70% of respondents “never” did so, while as many as 32.00% “rarely” did so.

Table 5. Frequency of responses regarding the frequency of the indicated spiritual care interventions (N = 194).

Intervention N % 95% CI

I promote hope and optimism in patients.

Never 0 0.00% Rarely 1 0.50% 0.10% 2.40%

Sometimes 21 10.80% 7.00% 15.80% Very often 54 27.80% 21.90% 34.40%

Always 118 60.80% 53.80% 67.50%

I pray with patients if needed.

Never 37 19.10% 14.00% 25.00% Rarely 42 21.60% 16.30% 27.80%

Sometimes 57 29.40% 23.30% 36.10% Very often 28 14.40% 10.00% 19.90%

Always 30 15.50% 10.90% 21.00%

I make sure that patients have the opportunity to attend

religious services.

Never 8 4.10% 2.00% 7.60% Rarely 34 17.50% 12.70% 23.30%

Sometimes 54 27.80% 21.90% 34.40% Very often 38 19.60% 14.50% 25.60%

Always 60 30.90% 24.70% 37.70%

I read books, newspapers and other publications to patients when needed.

Never 44 22.70% 17.20% 28.90% Rarely 62 32.00% 25.70% 38.80%

Sometimes 61 31.40% 25.20% 38.20% Very often 13 6.70% 3.80% 10.90%

Always 14 7.20% 4.20% 11.50%

I involve a member of clergy in patient care.

Never 19 9.80% 6.20% 14.60% Rarely 23 11.90% 7.90% 17.00%

Sometimes 47 24.20% 18.60% 30.60% Very often 56 28.90% 22.80% 35.50%

Always 49 25.30% 19.50% 31.70%

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 7 of 14

Table 5. Cont.

Intervention N % 95% CI

I engage in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their

past accomplishments.

Never 3 1.50% 0.40% 4.10% Rarely 10 5.20% 2.70% 9.00%

Sometimes 59 30.40% 24.30% 37.10% Very often 64 33.00% 26.70% 39.80%

Always 58 29.90% 23.80% 36.60%

I talk to patients about their impending death if they feel the need

to do so.

Never 5 2.60% 1.00% 5.60% Rarely 16 8.20% 5.00% 12.70%

Sometimes 72 37.10% 30.50% 44.10% Very often 46 23.70% 18.10% 30.10%

Always 55 28.40% 22.40% 35.00%

3.4. Descriptive Data on Confidence Level in Spiritual Care Interventions

Table 6 shows the respondents’ self-reported level of confidence in the spiritual care in- terventions listed. In total, 41.20% of respondents indicated that their confidence in promoting hope and optimism in patients was “excellent”. In total, 34.00% stated that their confidence in praying with patients was “good”. The majority of respondents, 35.10%, considered their confidence in making sure that patients had the opportunity to attend religious services to be “good”. Similarly, the majority of respondents, 40.20%, rated their confidence in reading books and other publications as “good”. In total, 35.10% of respondents rated their confidence in talking to patients about their impending death as “very good”.

Table 6. Frequency of responses on the self-reported confidence level in the listed spiritual care interventions (N = 194).

Confidence Level in the Following Areas N % 95% CI

Promoting hope and optimism in patients

Poor 1 0.50% 0.10% 2.40% Fair 3 1.50% 0.40% 4.10%

Good 36 18.60% 13.60% 24.50% Very good 74 38.10% 31.50% 45.10% Excellent 80 41.20% 34.50% 48.30%

Praying with patients

Poor 17 8.80% 5.40% 13.40% Fair 23 11.90% 7.90% 17.00%

Good 66 34.00% 27.60% 40.90% Very good 56 28.90% 22.80% 35.50% Excellent 32 16.50% 11.80% 22.20%

Making sure that patients have the opportunity to attend religious services

Poor 11 5.70% 3.00% 9.60% Fair 21 10.80% 7.00% 15.80%

Good 68 35.10% 28.60% 41.90% Very good 56 28.90% 22.80% 35.50% Excellent 38 19.60% 14.50% 25.60%

Reading books, newspapers, and other publications to patients

Poor 14 7.20% 4.20% 11.50% Fair 26 13.40% 9.20% 18.70%

Good 78 40.20% 33.50% 47.20% Very good 47 24.20% 18.60% 30.60% Excellent 29 14.90% 10.50% 20.50%

Involving a member of clergy in patient care

Poor 8 4.10% 2.00% 7.60% Fair 24 12.40% 8.30% 17.60%

Good 41 21.10% 15.80% 27.30% Very good 70 36.10% 29.60% 43.00% Excellent 51 26.30% 20.50% 32.80%

Engaging in discussions with patients about the meaning of life and their past accomplishments

Poor 1 0.50% 0.10% 2.40% Fair 11 5.70% 3.00% 9.60%

Good 44 22.70% 17.20% 28.90% Very good 80 41.20% 34.50% 48.30% Excellent 58 29.90% 23.80% 36.60%

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 8 of 14

Table 6. Cont.

Confidence Level in the Following Areas N % 95% CI

Talking to patients about their impending death

Poor 2 1.00% 0.20% 3.30% Fair 22 11.30% 7.50% 16.40%

Good 53 27.30% 21.40% 33.90% Very good 68 35.10% 28.60% 41.90% Excellent 49 25.30% 19.50% 31.70%

3.5. Correlation between Work Setting, Professional Experience, and Level of Education and the Frequency of Providing Spiritual Care and the Level of Confidence in Spiritual Care Interventions

The correlation between work setting and the frequency of spiritual care delivery and confidence in delivering these interventions among nurses/technicians in specialised pal- liative care services is shown in Tables 7 and 8. ANOVA showed no significant differences.

Table 7. Correlation between work setting and the frequency of spiritual care and the level of confidence in spiritual care interventions.

N Arithmetic Mean

SD 95% CI

Lower Upper

Frequency of spiritual care

Member of a mobile palliative care team 38 3.27 0.77 3.02 3.53 Palliative care coordinator 15 3.60 0.59 3.27 3.93

Nurse/technician in an inpatient clinic at the health centre 23 3.71 0.66 3.43 4.00

Nurse technician at a palliative care facility/unit 109 3.49 0.73 3.35 3.63 Nurse/technician at a hospice 9 3.40 0.73 2.83 3.96

Confidence in spiritual care

Member of a mobile palliative care team 38 3.64 0.66 3.43 3.86 Palliative care coordinator 15 4.10 0.64 3.74 4.45

Nurse/technician in an inpatient clinic at a health centre 23 3.79 0.65 3.51 4.07

Nurse technician at a palliative care facility/unit 109 3.58 0.76 3.44 3.73 Nurse/technician at a hospice 9 3.46 0.68 2.94 3.98

Table 8. Results of the one-way ANOVA in relation to the data from Table 7.

Sum of Squares df Mean Squares F P

Frequency of spiritual care Between groups 3.148 4 0.787 1.511 0.201 Within groups 98.428 189 0.521

Total 101.576 193

Confidence in spiritual care Between groups 4.227 4 1.057 2.039 0.091 Within groups 97.967 189 0.518

Total 102.194 193

The correlation between professional experience in healthcare, professional experience in palliative care, level of education, the importance given to spiritual care in nursing education, and the frequency of spiritual care and level of confidence in spiritual care is shown in Table 9. A statistically significant correlation was determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Years of work experience in the healthcare system and in palliative care, as well as the level of education, did not demonstrate statistically significant correlations with the frequency of implementing interventions for addressing spiritual needs or with knowledge about them. However, participants who received sufficient instruction on spiritual care during their formal education statistically significantly more frequently engage in spiritual care and possess greater knowledge about it.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 9 of 14

Table 9. Correlation between professional experience in healthcare, professional experience in palliative care, level of education, importance given to spiritual care in nursing education, and the frequency of spiritual care and the level of confidence in spiritual care.

Spiritual Care Interventions

Confidence in Spiritual Care

Experience in healthcare r −0.009 <0.001 P 0.851 0.999

Experience in palliative care r 0.085 0.055 P 0.103 0.294

Level of education r −0.017 0.062 P 0.772 0.280

Sufficient importance given to spiritual care in nursing in formal education

r 0.125 0.297 P 0.022 <0.001

4. Discussion

Palliative care involves the active and holistic care of people with advanced, progres- sive illnesses that do not respond to curative treatment. It includes the relief of pain and other distressing symptoms as well as the provision of psychological, social, and spiritual support for the patient and their family [19–21], respecting their values [22]. Palliative care takes an interdisciplinary approach in which nurses, alongside other professionals, play a key role in maintaining quality of life and supporting patients and their families [23].

By definition, palliative care involves comprehensive, i.e., holistic care. This holistic approach is essential not only for patients diagnosed with chronic illnesses but also for those receiving palliative care and should form the core of daily care provided to critically ill patients [24]. Holistic nursing is defined as a nursing practice that aims to address the entirety of the individual, taking into consideration the physical, mental, social, and spiritual dimensions of the patient [25].

All dimensions of a person must be taken into account in patient care; however, in palliative care patients, spiritual needs often take centre stage [26,27]. Spirituality is expressed in values, beliefs, and traditions and involves the pursuit and expression of meaning and purpose as well as a sense of connectedness to oneself, others, nature, or something that is meaningful or sacred to the individual [28]. Spirituality is a deeply personal experience and is widely recognised as beneficial in dealing with challenging situations such as terminal illness [29,30].

A survey involving 194 nurses working in specialised palliative care services in Croa- tia examined the frequency of interventions that address the spiritual needs of palliative care patients and the nurses’ self-reported level of confidence in these interventions. The descriptive data reveal that among the interventions listed, promoting hope and optimism in patients was the most common intervention. It was reported to have been undertaken by the majority of interrogated nurses, with most of them assessing their confidence in performing this activity as “very good” or “excellent”. Just over half of the participants reported frequently engaging in discussions with patients about their imminent death when patients felt the need to do so, with most assessing their confidence in performing this activity as “very good” or “excellent”. Moreover, almost two-thirds of study participants stated that they frequently discussed the meaning of life and past accomplishments with their patients, with most stating that their confidence in doing so was “very good” or “excellent”. However, only 13.9% of respondents reported frequently reading books, news- papers, and other publications to patients when needed, with a little over one-third of them rating their level of confidence in this activity as “very good” or “excellent”. More than two-thirds of respondents admitted to “never” or “rarely” praying with patients or doing so “sometimes”; furthermore, only half of the study participants reported making sure that patients “always” or “very often” have the opportunity to attend religious services, with 48.5% expressing “very good” or “excellent” confidence in this regard. Interestingly,

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 10 of 14

more than half of respondents either “always” or “very often” involved a priest or other religious official in patient care, with 57.2% feeling “very good” or “excellent” in their confidence levels for this intervention. The authors Burkhardt and Nagail-Jacobson point out that spirituality is the least understood human dimension in nursing practice and is often misunderstood as purely religious needs [31]. This study found that more than half of respondents engage in interventions that include various aspects of spirituality beyond religiosity. However, the intervention “reading books and other publications to patients” is only undertaken by a small percentage of participants (just over 10%), despite research demonstrating its benefits to patient well-being [32–34]. A systematic literature review demonstrates how nurses highlight shortcomings in their initial nursing education, expressing a need for additional training, comprehension, and professional support to recognise and deliver spiritual care effectively [35].

For patients who are religious and fulfil their spiritual needs through religious rites and rituals, the nurse should act as an intermediary between the patient and a priest, who, unlike the nurse, may not always be available to the patient [36]. However, in the present study, it was found that more than 60% of participants did not pray with patients, and only slightly more than half of them made sure that patients had the opportunity to attend religious services or involved a priest or other religious official in patient care. A study conducted in Saudi Arabia demonstrated that religious practices such as prayer and Quran recitation can contribute to an overall improvement in health and help cancer patients better cope with their illness [37]. Moreover, higher levels of spirituality have been associated with fewer depressive disorders [38], which are common in palliative care patients [39], indicating the importance of supporting patients to engage in spiritual practices. A study on spiritual care practices in nursing care revealed that 93% of nurses recognised that patients have spiritual needs, but only about two-thirds of participants reported actively engaging in spiritual care practices [40], which is consistent with the findings of this study. For religious patients, religion is the most important dimension of spirituality [38], indicating the need to improve spiritual care for religious patients. O’Callaghan et al. conclude that spiritual care providers in hospitals should strive to recognise individuals who are in need of pastoral or religiously oriented support [41]. It is noteworthy that patients and their families generally expect empathy and compassion from caregivers rather than profound spiritual care [27], a factor to be considered in daily practice.

No statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of spiritual care interventions in relation to work settings in specialised palliative care services. Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in confidence in interventions that address the spiritual needs of palliative care patients. These results are not surprising given that nurses’ education and additional training are not dependent on their work setting in specialised palliative care services. Furthermore, professional experience in healthcare, palliative care, and level of education had no statistically significant impact on the frequency of spiritual care interventions or confidence in delivering these interventions. This result was surprising, as one would expect that nurses with longer work experience and higher levels of education would have greater confidence in their knowledge and skills in spiritual care interventions and would perform them more frequently due to formal and experiential learning, as Filej and Kaučić found in their study on holistic care [42]. This suggests the possibility that the formal training of nurses may have neglected the spiritual needs of patients and the interventions to address them. However, participants who reported receiving adequate formal training in spiritual needs and spiritual care interventions were statistically significantly more likely to perform them and reported higher confidence in their knowledge and skills in this area compared to those who did not. This suggests that factors other than training influence the delivery of spiritual care to patients. Mugia et al. point out that nurses may not provide spiritual care to patients in their daily work due to a lack of time or skills [43]. Balboni et al. claim that failure to adequately address patients’ spiritual needs primarily results from inadequate staff training, with nurses often advocating for additional training in this aspect of care [44]. Selman et al. maintain that all

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 11 of 14

healthcare professionals, particularly in palliative care, should have a basic knowledge of spiritual care [45]. In addition to knowledge gaps, other authors cite increased workload, shortage of nursing staff, and lack of guidelines for spiritual care as reasons for neglecting patients’ spiritual needs [46–48]. Considering that nurses in Croatia experience similar challenges and barriers, these factors may contribute to the fact that patients’ spiritual needs are not sufficiently addressed in that country as well. Future research should, therefore, focus on identifying barriers to the provision of spiritual care to patients.

In the context of palliative care, understanding and addressing religious and spiri- tual struggles are crucial aspects of providing holistic care to patients facing end-of-life challenges [49,50]. These struggles can profoundly impact patients’ emotional well-being, coping mechanisms, and overall quality of life [49,50]. Certainly, we also have to acknowl- edge potential differences in religious or spiritual background between caregiver and patient that could play a role in the desired and provided spiritual care. Additionally, there is the matter of a nonreligious nurse offering prayers to a religious patient, which warrants further exploration of how it impacts the overall process of care.

There are several limitations to our study. Although we utilized a random sample of nurses from specialized palliative care services in Croatia, it is important to note that the sample may not be fully representative of all nurses working in palliative care in the Republic of Croatia. More specifically, biases in the selection process (such as certain institutions being overrepresented or underrepresented) could have potentially impacted the generalizability of our findings. There is also a possibility of response bias, and self- assessments of confidence levels may not always align with actual performance. Given the sensitive nature of the topics covered in the questionnaire, such as addressing patients’ spiritual needs and the importance of holistic care, respondents might have felt pressured to provide responses that align with societal or professional expectations rather than expressing their true opinions or practices. We also did not extensively explore potential confounding variables that could influence the frequency of addressing spiritual needs or confidence levels, such as individual religious beliefs or cultural backgrounds of the nurses, variations in patient demographics, and preferences or organizational factors within healthcare settings. Finally, there may be other important aspects of holistic care or spiritual support that were not included in the questionnaire, potentially limiting the comprehensiveness of the findings.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that approximately two-thirds of nurses “often” or “always” provide some kind of spiritual care to palliative care patients. It suggests the need to identify and remove barriers to the provision of spiritual care, whether through improving nursing education or through organisational changes in specialised palliative care services in Croatia. There is also a need for improved collaboration in healthcare. While nurses bear the primary responsibility for patient care, involving other healthcare professionals (such as clergy members) can enrich the spiritual support provided to patients, which definitely aligns with the holistic nature of palliative care and promotes comprehensive well-being. Although existing frameworks offer valuable insights into holistic patient care, dedicated guidelines focusing on spiritual support should be developed to provide nursing professionals with clear direction and standardised approaches. Finally, our study prompts reflection on healthcare practices in general, emphasising the importance of patient-centred care. By prioritising patients’ spiritual needs and preferences, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care and promote patients’ comfort and dignity.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, T.K. and M.N.; methodology, T.K. and M.N.; software, T.K.; validation, M.N.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K.; resources, M.N.; data curation, T.K. and M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, M.N.; visualization, T.K.; supervision, M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 12 of 14

Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Novo mesto (FZV-282/2021, 29 October 2021).

Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References 1. Murtagh, F.E.M.; Bausewein, C.; Verne, J.; Groeneveld, E.I.; Kaloki, Y.E.; Higginson, I.J. How many people need palliative care? A

study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates. Palliat. Med. 2014, 28, 49–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. World Health Organization. Palliative Care. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-

care (accessed on 25 January 2024). 3. Etkind, S.N.; Bone, A.E.; Gomes, B.; Lovell, N.; Evans, C.J.; Higginson, I.J.; Murtagh, F.E.M. How many people will need palliative

care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services. BMC Med. 2017, 15, 102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Braš, M.; Ðord̄ević, V.; Kandić-Splavski, B.; Vučevac, V. Basic concepts of palliative medicine and palliative care. Medix 2016,

22, 69–76. 5. European Association for Palliative Care. White Paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: Part 1.

Eur. J. Palliat. Care 2009, 16, 278–289. 6. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia. National Program for the Development of Palliative Care in the Republic of Croatia

2017–2020; Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia: Zagreb, Croatia, 2017; Volume 28, pp. 14–15. 7. Mard̄etko, R.; Dumbović, N. Center for Palliative Care Coordination: Palliative Care Coordinator in the County; Ministry of Health of

the Republic of Croatia: Zagreb, Croatia, 2017; pp. 5–8. 8. Julião, M.; Sobral, M.A.; Calçada, P.; Antunes, B.; Nunes, B.; Bragança, A.; Runa, D.; Faria de Sousa, P.; Chochinov, H.M.; Bruera,

E. Truly holistic? Differences in documenting physical and psychosocial needs and hope in Portuguese palliative patients. Palliat. Support. Care 2021, 19, 69–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Van der Eijk, M.; Faber, M.J.; Al Shamma, S.; Munneke, M.; Bloem, B.R. Moving towards patient-centered healthcare for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2011, 17, 360–364. [CrossRef]

10. Csikai, E.L.; Weisenfluh, S. Hospice and palliative social workers’ engagement in life review interventions. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 2013, 30, 257–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11. Steinhauser, K.E.; Christakis, N.A.; Clipp, E.C.; McNeilly, M.; McIntyre, L.; Tulsky, J.A. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 2000, 284, 2476–2482. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Gijsberts, M.H.E.; Liefbroer, A.I.; Otten, R.; Olsman, E. Spiritual care in palliative care: A systematic review of the recent european literature. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Christian, L. Making space in education and practice for spiritual care. Kai Tiaki Nurs. N. Z. 2020, 26, 30–32. 14. Southard, M.E. Spirituality the Missing Link for Holistic Health Care. J. Holist. Nurs. 2020, 38, 4–7. [CrossRef] 15. Parast, L.; Elliott, M.N.; Haas, A.; Teno, J.; Bradley, M.; Weech-Maldonado, R.; Anhang Price, R. Association between Receipt of

Emotional Support and Caregivers’ Overall Hospice Rating. J. Palliat. Med. 2021, 24, 689–696. [CrossRef] 16. Aydin, A.; Hiçdurmaz, D. Holistic nursing competence scale: Turkish translation and psychometric testing. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2019,

66, 425–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 17. Zamanzadeh, V.; Jasemi, M.; Valizadeh, L.; Keogh, B.; Taleghani, F. Effective factors in providing holistic care: A qualitative study.

Indian J. Palliat. Care 2015, 21, 214–224. [CrossRef] 18. Vuletić, S.; Juranić, B.; Mikšić, Š.; Rakošec, Ž. Palliative care and medical-spiritual needs of terminal patients. Bogosl. Smotra 2014,

84, 881–906. 19. Payne, S.; Harding, A.; Williams, T.; Ling, J.; Ostgathe, C. Revised recommendations on standards and norms for palliative care in

Europe from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC): A Delphi study. Palliat. Med. 2022, 36, 680–697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20. Dixon, J.; King, D.; Matosevic, T.; Clark, M.; Knapp, M. Equity in the Provision of Palliative Care in the UK: Review of Evidence; London School of Economics and Political Science: London, UK, 2015; pp. 15–16.

21. Glare, P. Person-centered care: Palliative care. In Contemporary Findings from Palliative Medicine; Braš, M., Ðord̄ević, V., Eds.; Medicinska Naklada: Zagreb, Croatia, 2012; pp. 3–15.

22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Available online: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/palliative. pdf (accessed on 7 January 2024).

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 13 of 14

23. Dobrina, R.; Tenze, M.; Palese, A. An overview of hospice and palliative care nursing models and theories. Int. J. Palliat. 2014, 20, 75–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24. Davis, A.; Lippe, M.; Burduli, E.; Barbosa-Leiker, C. Development of a new undergraduate palliative care knowledge measure. J. Prof. Nurs. 2020, 63, 47–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

25. American Nurses Association; American Holistic Nurses Association. Holistic Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice, 3rd ed.; American Holistic Nurses Association: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2019; pp. 1–64.

26. Camacho-Montaño, L.R.; Pérez-Corrales, J.; Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres, M.; Martin-Pérez, A.M.; Güeita-Rodríguez, J.; Velarde- García, J.F.; Palacios-Ceña, D. Spiritual Care in Advanced Dementia from the Perspective of Health Providers: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Occup. Ther. Int. 2021, 24, 9998480. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27. Pearce, M.J.; Coan, A.D.; Herndon, J.E.; Koenig, H.G.; Abernethy, A.P. Unmet Spiritual Care Needs Impact Emotional and Spiritual Well-Being in Advanced Cancer Patients. Support. Care Cancer 2012, 20, 2269–2276. [CrossRef]

28. Puchalski, C.M.; Vitillo, R.; Hull, S.K.; Reller, N. Improving the spiritual dimension of whole person care: Reaching national and international consensus. J. Palliat. Med. 2014, 17, 642–656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29. Almaraz, D.; Saiz, J.; Moreno Martín, F.; Sánchez-Iglesias, I.; Molina, A.J.; Goldsby, T.L. What Aspects of Religion and Spirituality Affect the Physical Health of Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30. Monareng, L.V. Spiritual Nursing Care: A Concept Analysis. Curationis 2012, 35, 28. [CrossRef] 31. Burkhardt, M.A.; Nagail-Jacobson, M.G. Spirituality and health. In Dossey & Keegan’s Holistic Nursing, 8th ed.; Blaszko Helming,

M.A., Shields, D.A., Avino, K.M., Rosa, W.E., Eds.; Jones & Barlett Learning: Burlington, VT, USA, 2020; pp. 121–142. 32. Bálint, Á.; Magyari, J. The Use of Bibliotherapy in Revealing and Addressing the Spiritual Needs of Cancer Patients. Religions

2020, 11, 128. [CrossRef] 33. Malibiran, R.; Tariman, J.; Amer, K. Bibliotherapy: Appraisal of Evidence for Patients Diagnosed with Cancer. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs.

2018, 22, 377–380. [CrossRef] 34. Roberts, N.; Lee, V.; Ananng, B.; Körner, A. Acceptability of bibliotherapy for patients with cancer: A qualitative, descriptive

study. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2016, 43, 588–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 35. Batstone, E.; Bailey, C.; Hallett, N. Spiritual care provision to end-of-life patients: A systematic literature review. J. Clin. Nurs.

2020, 29, 3609–3624. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Caldeira, S.; Timmins, F.; de Carvalho, E.C.; Vieira, M. Spiritual Well-Being and Spiritual Distress in Cancer Patients Undergoing

Chemotherapy: Utilizing the SWBQ as Component of Holistic Nursing Diagnosis. J. Relig. Health 2017, 56, 1489–1502. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

37. Shaheen Al Ahwal, M.; Al Zaben, F.; Sehlo, M.G.; Khalifa, D.A.; Koenig, H.G. Religious Beliefs, Practices, and Health in Colorectal Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia. Psycho-Oncology 2015, 25, 292–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

38. Koenig, H.G. Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. Can. J. Psychiatry 2009, 54, 283–291. [CrossRef] 39. Grassi, L.; Caruso, R.; Riba, M.B.; Lloyd-Williams, M.; Kissane, D.; Rodin, G.; McFarland, D.; Campos-Ródenas, R.; Zachariae, R.;

ESMO Guidelines Committee; et al. Anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. ESMO Open 2023, 8, 101155. [CrossRef]

40. DeKoninck, B.; Hawkins, L.A.; Fyke, J.P.; Neal, T.; Currier, K. Spiritual Care Practices of Advanced Practice Nurses: A Multina- tional Study. J. Nurse Pract. 2016, 12, 536–544. [CrossRef]

41. O’Callaghan, C.; Seah, D.; Clayton, J.M.; Welz, M.; Kissane, D.; Georgousopoulou, E.N.; Michael, N. Palliative Caregivers’ Spirituality, Views About Spiritual Care, and Associations with Spiritual Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 2020, 37, 305–313. [CrossRef]

42. Filej, B.; Kaučić, B.M. Holistic nursing practice. South East. Eur. Health Sci. J. 2013, 3, 1–7. 43. Murgia, C.; Notarnicola, I.; Caruso, R.; De Maria, M.; Rocco, G.; Stievano, A. Spirituality and Religious Diversity in Nursing: A

Scoping Review. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Balboni, T.A.; Balboni, M.; Enzinger, A.C.; Gallivan, K.; Paulk, M.E.; Wright, A.; Steinhauser, K.; VanderWeele, T.J.; Prigerson, H.G.

Provision of spiritual support to patients with advanced cancer by religious communities and associations with medical care at the end of life. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 24, 1109–1117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

45. Selman, L.E.; Brighton, L.J.; Sinclair, S.; Karvinen, I.; Egan, R.; Speck, P.; Powell, R.A.; Deskur-Smielecka, E.; Glajchen, M.; Adler, S. Patients’ and Caregivers’ Needs, Experiences, Preferences and Research Priorities in Spiritual Care: A Focus Group Study across Nine Countries. Palliat. Med. 2018, 32, 216–230. [CrossRef]

46. Ambushe, S.A.; Awoke, N.; Demissie, B.W.; Tekalign, T. Holistic nursing care practice and associated factors among nurses in public hospitals of Wolaita zone, South Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2023, 22, 390. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

47. Nist, M.D.; Harrison, T.M.; Tate, J.; Robinson, A.; Balas, M.; Pickler, R.H. Losing touch. Nurs. Inq. 2020, 27, e12368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

48. Mathew, S. Perception of holistic nursing care among nurses working in a selected hospital at Pathanamthitta district, Kerala. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 7, 279–286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Healthcare 2024, 12, 725 14 of 14

49. Damen, A.; Exline, J.; Pargament, K.; Yao, Y.; Chochinov, H.; Emanuel, L.; Handzo, G.; Wilkie, D.J.; Fitchett, G. Prevalence, Predictors and Correlates of Religious and Spiritual Struggles in Palliative Cancer Patients. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2021, 62, e139–e147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

50. Taylor, E.J. Communicating with Persons Who Express Spiritual Struggle at the End of Life. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 2021, 24, 199–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Copyright of Healthcare (2227-9032) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.